In Minnesota, we are awesome at educating some of our students. It is what our system was designed to do, and we do it well.
We batch kids by age, teach them mostly in the same way at the same pace, and it works great for some kids.
When we designed the current educational system back in the 1890s, that's all we were looking to do. Back then, only 6 percent of Americans finished four years of high school.
Our expectations of schools have changed a lot since the 1890s. Today we want all our students to succeed. And while our demands have changed dramatically, our schools have not. We are still batching kids by age and teaching them mostly in the same way at the same pace. We are just trying harder.
After years of involvement with education reform efforts in various ways, I am convinced now that improving education outcomes is not about working harder. It's about working differently.
Schools don't have to look the way they do.
If we were starting over today, with the goal of having all children succeed, we would do it differently. We would recognize that kids come with different cultural and family backgrounds, different learning styles, and different aspirations. We would create a system that matches instruction and support with that diversity of backgrounds, learning styles and aspirations. We would tailor the education experience to the individual student.
If we are serious about saying that we want all kids to succeed, we've got to move away from a one-size-fits-all approach and toward customization. We've got to make education relevant for each student in terms of who they are, how they learn, and where they want to go.