It was just before 2 p.m. on a recent afternoon and there, in a nondescript building in an industrial area of Brooklyn Park, Shannon Slatton was ready to go live.
Standing on a studio set at CCX Media, a community television station with an exclusive focus on nine cities in the northwestern suburbs of the Twin Cities, she used a screen in front of her to quickly fix a single hair that was out of place before launching into the top story of the day: A Robbinsdale man was charged after he allegedly tampered with the oxygen supply to patients at a hospital. The camera then moved over to reporter Jay Wilcox, who had results from a recent state Nordic ski meet, occasionally cutting to interviews with high school athletes.
It was the kind of hyperlocal take that is at the core of public access television. Funded by local governments through an annual fee from private cable companies as right of way for using public property for cable, they cover topics ranging from high school sports to school board and city council meetings. But after nearly four decades on the air, CCX and other community television stations across the country say that funding source is being threatened by a new interpretation of law by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).
The 1984 Cable Communications Policy Act paved the way for local governments to collect up to 5% of gross revenue of cable services in their area — known as franchise fees — to dedicate toward public access programming.
But in August, the FCC said that, under its interpretation of the law, a cable company can place a market value on any in-kind contributions that it also contributes to a community, things such as free cable connections in schools, libraries or government buildings, or service discounts for seniors or low-income families. Now, those in-kind contributions can be counted against the total franchise fee they pay governments.
The move is part of broader effort from the FCC to get the same cable companies to expand broadband access in rural communities by cutting back on regulations.
"Every dollar paid in excessive fees is a dollar that by definition cannot and will not be invested in upgrading and expanding networks," said FCC Chairman Ajit Pai when the change passed the FCC last year. The commission did not provide further comment for this story.
But opponents of the FCC's interpretation argue that in some communities, the new rule could significantly reduce franchise fees, forcing cities to choose between public programming or things like snowplows or fixing potholes.