Much to our digital sports editor's chagrin, I've yet to conduct a live startribune.com chat (I promise, it's coming), so I figured this was a perfect time for the first Sunday Insider Q&A of the season. Questions were submitted on my blog, Russo's Rants, at startribune.com/russo.
Waferthin: Who is most likely to be exposed in the expansion draft: Marco Scandella, Jonas Brodin or Matt Dumba?
Russo: Frankly, maybe two of them. Since the Wild would likely choose the option of protecting seven forwards, three defensemen and one goalie, the Wild would only be able to protect three defensemen, and Ryan Suter has to be one (no-move clause). That means the Wild would only be able to protect two among Scandella, Brodin, Dumba, Jared Spurgeon, Christian Folin, Gustav Olofsson and Nate Prosser. I'll delve more into this in my expansion enterprise pieces running in Wednesday's Strib.
BrodieManMN: Do you have more detail on what Wild GM Chuck Fletcher and Sabres GM Tim Murray had cooking with Evander Kane?
Russo: I can only say that I've been told by multiple sources multiple times that there were trade talks. But you can assume that in order to add $5.25 million in salary (even if salary/cap space were retained), it would have had to be a "hockey trade."
Qvanminn: What is Bruce Boudreau's position on the use of skate/foot protection in light of the current injury situation? Why is he not insistent that all players utilize it?
Russo: He's not allowed. Fletcher has tried for years, and he has convinced all defensemen except Suter to wear something, as well as forwards Mikael Granlund, Jason Zucker, Erik Haula and Zac Dalpe. As Haula's injury shows, nothing's foolproof. If you read last Sunday's Insider, Boudreau, in a comical way, proposed taking all protection away.
Mikeile: Biggest surprises so far?