The NHL's "cap recapture" bothered me, which is why I sat down with NHL Deputy Commissioner Bill Daly in New York last Monday, to have him explain why this concept is kosher.
Cap recapture is a punishment clause jammed into the 2013 NHL/NHLPA collective bargaining agreement. Basically, teams that operated under the rules of the 2005 CBA are punished in the new CBA for what was an otherwise legal activity — back-diving a contract.
Wild fans might one day become all too familiar with this. If Zach Parise and/or Ryan Suter retire before their contracts expire in 2025, the Wild is in trouble.
Let's say one retired in 2020: The team would be charged a $3.938 million salary cap penalty in each of the next five seasons. Let's say the other retired in 2021: The Wild would be charged a $5.038 million cap penalty in each of the next four seasons. It gets much higher in 2022-25.
There are several scenarios (even if traded) that force teams to pay back the cap advantage they received if a player with this type of contract retires prematurely (see www.capgeek.com). It affects about 20 players.
This was the NHL's way of punishing teams it felt designed contracts meant to circumvent the cap. To lower their cap hits to $7.5-plus million the Wild, which is paying Parise and Suter between $8 million and $12 million annually through 2021, structured a contract that drops their salaries to $6 million in 2021-22, $2 million in 2022-23 and $1 million in 2023-24 and 2024-25. Other teams offered Parise and Suter almost identically structured contracts.
Daly acknowledges the Parise and Suter contracts were "legal" and "not improper" in the old CBA. But in later collective bargaining with the union, Daly said, "the judgment was made that it was not consistent with the spirit of the CBA and there should be a cost associated with getting competitive benefits theoretically by seriously frontloading deals."
The players whose contracts are affected by the recapture include Sidney Crosby, Roberto Luongo, Shea Weber, Duncan Keith and Marian Hossa. They all have what the NHL fears are phony, low-paying years tacked on with the player having no intention of fulfilling.