Testimony about body camera policies should be prohibited or severely limited, and other police officers' experiences with civilians slapping their squad cars should not be allowed at the murder trial of former Minneapolis police officer Mohamed Noor, his attorneys argued in motions filed Friday.
The two are contentious issues in the July 15, 2017, fatal shooting of Justine Ruszczyk Damond, which occurred shortly after Noor and his partner, Matthew Harrity, heard a slap on their squad vehicle. Neither officer had their body cameras on at the time, although they both activated them immediately afterward.
Noor, 33, pleaded not guilty to second-degree murder with intent, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter. He is scheduled to stand trial April 1 in Hennepin County District Court.
Defense attorneys Thomas Plunkett and Peter Wold wrote that prosecutors are expected to raise questions about Minneapolis' body camera policy and the officers' compliance.
"It creates an irrelevant sideshow about police policies and interpretations," they argued.
At minimum, they wrote, testimony should only include a statement about Minneapolis' body camera policy at the time "without argument or inferences that the policy was or was not followed."
Damond was shot several months into the department's use of the technology, during which officers were given leeway on camera activation.
Noor and Harrity were responding to a 911 call Damond made regarding a possible sexual assault behind her south Minneapolis home. The officers' squad camera was not running either. In the wake of Damond's death, the city adopted a stricter policy requiring body cameras to be activated in nearly every encounter with the public.