The fear of being ambushed on the job was fresh in officers' minds before the fatal shooting of Justine Ruszczyk Damond, a Minneapolis police lieutenant testified Friday.
Defense attorneys representing former Minneapolis police officer Mohamed Noor argue that he legally shot Damond in 2017 because he feared he was being set up for an attack in a south Minneapolis alley.
On Friday, they cross-examined one of Noor's supervisors at the time, crafting a picture of a department that was on high alert for threats due to attacks on police across the country.
Lt. Daniel May, who was then the supervisor in charge of the Fifth Precinct midwatch shift, told the court that ambushes on police were a "frequent" topic of conversation at roll call, the start of a shift where officers are debriefed on relevant issues.
May's turn on the witness stand proved to be fertile ground for the defense, who painted favorable pictures of Noor and his partner, Matthew Harrity, through May's evaluation of their work.
Prosecutors have said Noor acted unreasonably and in haste when he fired at Damond from inside his squad car.
Assistant Hennepin County Attorney Patrick Lofton attempted to dismantle the defense's strategy by pointing out that May's stance on officers' fear of ambush surfaced long after the shooting.
May cited the 2016 ambush in Dallas that killed five officers and wounded nine others, and a July 5, 2017 fatal shooting of a New York City officer as cases that had impacted the precinct's thinking about officer safety.