Part 4 of 4 in a series, "Our changing cities."
The Twin Cities area continues to attract more residents, but the addition of new park and recreation space is not keeping pace the way it has in the past.
That's raising questions among park officials who want to ensure that residents have ample recreational space, and to cement the region's top-tier reputation among urban outdoor enthusiasts.
"We don't feel that we have the land and acres yet to really satisfy the seven-county metro area," said Emmett Mullin, the Met Council's manager for regional parks, which account for a third of the parkland in the metro area.
Since 2010, the seven-country metro area has averaged one-third as much new park and recreation land annually as during the previous two decades, according to new Metropolitan Council data analyzed by the Star Tribune. The region boasts more than 200,000 acres of parkland, but the amount per resident has dropped slightly.
Parks advocates are trying parse what the lagging numbers mean. They attribute the slowdown to increasingly complex and expensive land buys, a larger focus on new trails, the closure of golf courses, and the pattern of cities growing up instead of sprawling out after the recession.
Boe Carlson, superintendent of Three Rivers Park District, said the agency serving west metro suburbs is focusing on amenities, like snow-making at Elm Creek Park Reserve, which began in 2012.
"We're not adding parkland, necessarily," Carlson said. "Now it's the point of developing it and getting opportunities for people to come out and recreate within the parks."