A prosecutor in the assault trial of Minneapolis police officer Efrem Hamilton argued Monday that her case was hampered by a "blue wall of silence" after three of the officer's colleagues changed or clarified their testimony on the witness stand.
Assistant Hennepin County attorney Tara Ferguson Lopez appealed to District Judge Fred Karasov following the testimony of three of Hamilton's fellow officers that she said differed in some details from statements they had given her office or documented in a police report.
Hamilton faces charges of second-degree assault and two counts of intentional discharge of a firearm, all felonies.
"The officers that previously testified — there were some very obvious and notable changes in what they indicated in their reports and in prior discussions, and what they testified about today," she told Karasov, later pointing out that some officers might feel indebted to Hamilton's defense attorney Fred Bruno, who regularly represents cops in court. "So I do think it's an issue in this case."
Ferguson Lopez said the officers — homicide detective Sgt. James Jensen and patrolmen Craig Williams and Chad Martin — "aside from being very hesitant and tentative witnesses, changed their testimony and how they provided that information." Ferguson Lopez stopped short of saying that the officers had tailored their testimony of the defense.
Of particular concern to Ferguson Lopez, who called the three officers as witnesses, were apparent discrepancies in statements they made on the night of shooting.
"Would it help to refresh your recollection of whether you smelled anything by taking a look at your report, officer?" she asked Williams after his response about whether he smelled gunpowder as he walked toward Hamilton's SUV.
Williams testified that he and Martin, his partner, happened to be in the area when the shooting occurred, describing the immediate aftermath as "calm," shattered moments later by was described as the sound of a tire popping.