The recent vote by the Minnesota Nurses Association to authorize a second unfair labor practices strike across Allina hospitals is an exciting and hopeful show of support between co-workers, but I fear that some onlookers outside of the hospitals suspect the nurses to be selfishly pursuing unreasonable demands from their employer.
Among other issues such as safe nurse-patient ratios and protection from violent patients, an overwhelming majority (more than two-thirds) of nurses are voting to keep their existing health insurance plans. These quality plans help them and their families stay healthy, a benefit for the entire community. Accusations of "selfishness" ignore the fact that union-led organizing efforts benefit all nurses and related professionals, union or not, as they raise the quality of compensation that any company must provide to remain competitive. Common arguments like "If I don't have it, why should they" ignore union-led successes such as the 40-hour workweek, the weekend and fair labor standards; unheard-of concepts that all started with the audacious demands of laborers and were achieved through organization. While these arguments are ironically selfish themselves, they also take the bizarre approach to equality that ends with us all fighting over scraps. Allina's highly compensated executive team is willing to open the company coffers, millions of dollars each week, to survive an open-ended strike. Solidarity is the coin of the nurses as they and their families risk heavy financial tolls bankrolling their own fight.
The Allina nurses, through a direct democratic vote, have elected to challenge the race-to-the-bottom effort of Allina to squeeze more out of each employee. Every nurse in the region should be rallying behind their cause — and hope that their contracts are not next. They deserve the community's strong and loud support in the weeks ahead as well, as their fight for dignity and representation at work is also ours.
John Jones, Minneapolis
• • •
Allina wants nurses on the corporate medical insurance, thereby saving $10 million per year. Allina pays $20 million to cover a one-week strike. What am I missing here?
Mike Best, Chaska
LIGHT RAIL
It helps in understanding to frame this as money and power
Here's a likely perspective after reading your good articles about Southwest light rail:
There's a continuum from monarchy to anarchy, with one in-between stage called oligarchy, in which a few individuals or groups have inordinate sway. Add the adage from the close to 6,000 years of what I call the Abrahamic faiths — the love of money as the root of all evil. Of course, folks will deny the love factor in most situations. Yet if good things are not being done and negative things are, it can be deduced or induced after a cost-benefit analysis that the love of money is going on.
A key fact in the coverage was that light rail costs about $2 billion (one time) to install, plus maintenance, but the car/gas industry brings in about $10 billion yearly. What I call the oligarchy doesn't want the latter threatened. (Remember Eisenhower's Texas oilmen warning. Now we have North Dakota ones, too.) Moving away from fossil fuel as we witness climate change is positive, while losing many socioeconomic benefits and federal dollars is not. Clearly, the love of money is a factor in opposition to the line.