As a 30-year veteran of the Minnesota Renaissance Festival, I have never felt that my virtue or my safety were in jeopardy while participating in the show ("Renaissance Fest workers allege sexual harassment," front page, Aug. 8). While I cannot speak for all the several thousand people who are staff, vendors or performers with the festival, to my knowledge there has never been a whiff of suspicion regarding sexually violent behavior occurring or tolerated. I believe that recent media coverage regarding the question of sexually violent behavior at the festival, and the salacious euphemisms used by the media to describe that alleged behavior, have led the public to believe that there is a prevailing "culture of sexual violence" that encompasses the entirety of the show. While that cannot be further from the truth, I will not deny that there has always been a bawdy atmosphere of an adult nature surrounding the show.
However, there are some perceptions that need to be clarified. First, I cannot emphasize enough that almost all festival participants (Rennies) feel that, together, we are a family. Second, we are a unique community of artists, actors, vendors and crew members who are not employed by Mid-America Festivals Corp. We are independent of the corporate entity of MAF, yet we rely on that entity to provide a venue and support services that allow our community to exist at all.
The majority of festival performers and crafters travel and live together like a nomadic tribe. We watch out for each other; we support each other; we censor each other. Many of us are third-generation Rennies. We have grown up together; we are growing old together; and we mourn the loss of one of us.
To reduce the sum total of 48 years of festival to a few "predatory" individuals is a heinous misrepresentation of the "culture" of an inherently diverse and inclusive community.
Please don't paint us all with the same brush.
Laura Hughes, Jordan
MINNEAPOLIS 2040 PLAN
A property-value plunger
To add to an Aug. 14 letter about Jonathon F. Mack's Aug. 13 commentary, "Minneapolis 2040 plan: Elite residents got what they voted for": In the effort to adjust to increased density and address the need for affordable housing, this plan is to gut the neighborhoods that are the crown jewels of the city, whose residents pay millions in taxes, by creating zoning that would allow developers — including huge, faceless corporations — to buy and destroy existing homes in established neighborhoods and build apartment buildings. And planners admit that this would not guarantee affordable housing in the future and that where it has been done in other cities, it hasn't worked. Really? Think of the long-range consequences. Would you buy a $400,000 house next to an apartment building? Or if you thought the house next door could become one? Watch as your tax base erodes if this plan is implemented as presented.
Jane K. Bygness, Minneapolis
CAROL BECKER DISPUTE
An ethical misjudgment
Minneapolis Board of Estimate and Taxation Member Carol Becker's attempt to silence and intimidate a citizen critic by filing specious legal documents in the name of his website and Twitter handle, Wedge Live, shows extremely poor judgment ("Wedge Live blogger, official spar over name," Aug. 14). To then lie about it by claiming she just happened to want that name for a podcast makes it worse.
We should expect our public servants to encourage feedback and conversation from constituents. Becker's abuse of the legal system to shut down criticism goes against everything a functioning democracy needs. She does not have the judgment or temperament needed to hold public office. She should resign immediately.