I know the opinion page editors want to allow the expression of a variety of viewpoints, but the lead letter on Sept. 8 about the prosecution of Jacob Wetterling's killer ("Citizens cannot abide this plea deal") seems designed to ramp up outrage, not to enlighten at all.
How did the letter writer propose to get Danny Heinrich to reveal where the body was, providing proof of a murder so that he could then be charged with it? Torture? Waterboarding? Waterboarding 183 times?
Editors should have made the writer address that question before printing his letter. I think the Star Tribune does an overall very good job, but this was a disappointment.
John Shockley, Minneapolis
Editor's note: In addition to wanting to reflect the range of views we receive, we give particular consideration to letters and commentaries that are at odds with the positions of the Star Tribune Editorial Board ("Justice served in Wetterling plea deal," Sept. 8). Here are more:
• • •
Wonderful! Here is a man, somewhat less than human, who abuses a frightened boy, then shoots him in the head and buries him. For 27 years, he successfully eludes police investigations, questionings and surveillance while living in relatively conscienceless comfort, if he even has a conscience. He is totally free of retribution or consequence of any kind for his scurrilous act.
Now, he comes forward with a completely detailed confession, no remorse — this is what happened and how. Everyone is exulted; closure. At last the mystery of Jacob Wetterling is revealed by the insidious perpetrator himself, now a poor, sick old man alone with no future, no help at home.
His penalty? One that fits the crime? Not justice; he gets a reward! The rest of his life with a roof over his head, three nutritious meals a day, free laundry, free medical care, TV, the internet, gym and exercise.