The Star Tribune Editorial Board's endorsement of U.S. Senate appointee Tina Smith ("DFL's Sen. Smith stands out — quietly," Aug. 9) was baffling and its reasoning disappointing. While recognizing that Smith voted on measures that benefited her personally because of her millions in stock holdings, the endorsement speculates that she will miraculously solve this ethical issue sometime in the future. It then hails her dealmaking ability but ignores her backroom deal to help PolyMet skirt the law against the will of the vast majority of Minnesotans. The board ignored the central issue plaguing the country — politicians serving personal and special interests first and the people last. As one threatened by these examples of "government for sale," my vote will be for Richard Painter, in the tradition of low-key Minnesota senators such as Humphrey, Wellstone and Franken.
Kelly Dahl, Linden Grove Township, St. Louis County
• • •
Politics has a way of making cynics of even the most hopeful among us. When you find a politician who seems to have the right solution to every problem and expresses each one clearly and succinctly without resorting to a flood of buzzwords, you have to be suspicious.
But then there's Richard Painter, a former Republican who worked as an associate counsel in the George W. Bush administration with a focus on ethics. Most of his professional life has been focused on ethical behavior of politicians, presidents and bankers. He worked on the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, an act built to protect investors — i.e., every American with a retirement plan. When he was ready to run for election, he decided that the GOP wasn't a party he could represent, so he moved to the DFL (he's a corporate law professor at the University of Minnesota).
If you're not familiar with him, here's the appropriate section of his website: www.painterminnesota.com/about. A cynic might ask, in this time of rampant unethical and all manner of swamp-type behavior, why haven't I heard of Richard Painter? Why wouldn't the DFL be just pleased as punch to have a reputable political adviser with tons of experience running for Al Franken's seat in the Senate? And why in the world won't Tina Smith debate him?
All good questions. Will you be an informed voter and try to get the answers for yourself? Let's send this unusually qualified person to the Senate for Minnesota.
Howard J. Miller, St. Paul
FIFTH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT
Endorsement, like party, treats Latinos as a wedge group
I was extremely disappointed to see the Star Tribune Editorial Board's endorsement of Margaret Anderson Kelliher for the Fifth Congressional District seat, as well as its flippant remarks about state Sen. Patricia Torres Ray and her ability to successfully represent our district and state in Congress ("Kelliher is a sure bet based on experience," Aug. 8).
We Latinos are perpetually treated as a wedge interest group by the DFL Party. Our community's issues — issues like family separation, driver's licenses, bilingual education and environmental justice — are seen as inconsequential and risky disruptions to the accomplishment of more "mainstream" DFL priorities. Corporate Democrats like Kelliher campaign toward the party's white centrists, touting their record of accomplishments in securing good outcomes for those voters' communities. The question remains unasked and unanswered — what did Kelliher do for us and for other communities of color when she was in office and in the eight years since she left office? What did she do to stop the separation of Native, African-American and Latino families by our government? Where has she been as the Republican Party has been brutalizing our Latino communities?