After reading yet another article about the city of Arden Hills and Ramsey County attempting to develop the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant (TCAAP) property ("Arden Hills stunned at revised plan," March 30), I have come to the conclusion that the city is just not equipped to be included in the development project. If not for the county, this project would not be at the launching point. It's time to seriously consider that the property be annexed from Arden Hills to either Shoreview or Mounds View. Too many years and too many tax dollars have been exhausted on this 427 acres. Other parts of the county would have seized upon this opportunity, and the project would be generating jobs, housing, infrastructure and tax revenue. I have worked with many Arden Hills leaders over 14 years, and they just don't have it in themselves to actually make a decision to begin this development.
Joe Murphy, Vadnais Heights
The writer is a former commissioner's assistant in Ramsey County and a former Vadnais Heights City Council member.
• • •
As Ramsey County and Arden Hills continue to move further apart in their dispute over the number of total housing units and affordable housing units that can be built on the county-owned TCAAP site, the Legislature could step in and resolve this by simply removing Arden Hills from the equation. If Ramsey County so desires, the Legislature should act to detach this land from Arden Hills, allowing the county to develop it as an unincorporated area for now. Once fully developed, it could remain directly governed by the County Board, become a separate municipality on its own, or perhaps neighboring Shoreview would be interested in annexing the property and its robust tax base. Arden Hills has no legitimate claim to governance over this massive vacant property.
Matt Brillhart, Minneapolis
ZIPPER MERGE
Why can't we do it? Because the guidance creates undue pressure
There is a simple answer to "Why can't Minnesotans learn to zipper merge in roadwork zones?" (March 31): The Minnesota Department of Transportation actually creates a "panic merge."
For whatever reason, whenever there is a lane closure, MnDOT sets up a sign advising drivers which lane is closed ahead. It then reinforces this with another sign advising drivers to merge, with arrows indicating which direction. This is the start of the backed-up "open lane" and the early merging from the "closed" lane.
If MnDOT would simply inform drivers with a sign saying "Road Work Ahead — Use Both Lanes," there would be no "panic merging." The drivers would remain in both lanes until reaching the construction zone, at which point they could practice "Minnesota nice" and zipper-merge, taking turns as intended in an orderly fashion.
Chris Wronski, Plymouth
• • •
The reason why zipper-merging is considered unfair has nothing to do with "Minnesota nice." It is seen as unfair because it is unfair, and only small-time cheats do it. Any construction zone I've encountered has had ample warning (more than a mile) that a lane is closing, and most people do the right thing and move out of it in a timely and efficient manner. It's unfair here and in California — which no longer recommends it — and every place where people exercise foresight and good sense in driving.
Garrett Tomczak, Golden Valley
AFTER DEATH …
If cremation workers are subject to health risks, what of others nearby?
The April 1 front-page article about health risks to cremation workers was interesting.