Minnesota chips in generously to help refugees adjust to life in the United States, but these costs make up a small fraction of the overall tab for public assistance programs.
Data the state compiled for the Star Tribune show that Minnesota spent more than $180 million in state and federal dollars on cash, food and medical assistance for refugees in 2015, the most recent period available. That's up 15 percent from five years ago but still less than 2 percent of total expenses for these programs. For state-subsidized child care, however, refugee communities have come to account for more than a quarter of costs.
"In the short term, resettlement can be a very fiscally intensive exercise because of the kinds of needs refugees bring," said Ryan Allen, an expert on resettlement at the University of Minnesota's Humphrey School. "As people of working age find jobs and become more self-sufficient, benefits will accrue over time."
Minnesota has joined a roiling national debate about how the upfront taxpayer costs of resettling refugees stack up against long-term benefits as they join the workforce.
Now, the Trump administration's move to pause and shrink the resettlement program brings fresh attention to the cost question, which Minnesota has never set out to answer.
Republican state legislators introduced a proposal last spring calling for an independent audit of all federal, state, local and nonprofit expenses for resettlement in Minnesota.
Sen. Bruce Anderson, R-Buffalo, says the federal government makes all major decisions about refugee arrivals but passes part of the cost to local communities, where taxpayers have little clue what they are paying.
"They say, 'OK, states. You take care of it. You make it happen,' " said Anderson, who reintroduced the proposal this year.