Does the world need another version of "Pride and Prejudice"? I mean, without zombies? In "Eligible," the fourth installment of the Austen Project — the retelling of Jane Austen's novels in modern settings — Curtis Sittenfeld has turned her prodigious talents to updating the story of feisty Elizabeth Bennet and the standoffish Mr. Darcy.
Review: 'Eligible,' by Curtis Sittenfeld
FICTION: A modern-day retelling of "Pride and Prejudice" falls flat, despite the author's strong effort.
Sittenfeld follows the plot and characters of Austen's novel scrupulously, though she moves the action to present-day Cincinnati. Liz is a magazine writer, Darcy a brain surgeon, Jane a placid yoga teacher and Mr. Bingley a doctor and star of a TV reality show.
Sittenfeld is a skilled writer, and the book is an entertaining, fast read. And yet this might be a project that was flawed in its conception: So much of Austen's premise does not translate to modern times. The ditsy Mrs. Bennet's passion to marry off her daughters to rich gentlemen doesn't ring true, and Sittenfeld had a heck of a time finding an appropriate modern-day transgression for the wild Mr. Wickham. (And failed, I'm afraid.)
The biggest sin, though, is Sittenfeld's lackluster Liz — snappish, not witty; bossy, not proud; and occasionally what my mother would call "potty-mouthed." Darcy, for his part, has a habit of responding to her tirades with a lugubrious "indeed." (Does anyone still use that word? I mean, anyone in Cincinnati?)
The previous Austen rewrites — Val McDermid's retelling of "Northanger Abbey," Joanna Trollope's version of "Sense & Sensibility," and Alexander McCall Smith's "Emma" — have gotten mixed reviews. Sittenfeld's is hard to recommend.
Laurie Hertzel is the Star Tribune's senior editor for books.
LOCAL FICTION: Featuring stories within stories, she’ll discuss the book at Talking Volumes on Tuesday.