Our governor and legislators might be a little busy now but by next session they should have read a new book called "Headquarters Economy" by business school Prof. Myles Shaver.
It's an easy read, but this isn't a recommendation for book club. They need to read it because they likely don't understand Minnesota's economy as well as they should — and certainly not as well as Shaver does.
Policymakers in other states might want to pick it up, too. Especially anyone who thought chasing after Amazon.com Inc.'s second headquarters seemed like a swell idea.
Shaver, on the faculty of the Carlson School of Management at the University of Minnesota, has been working on his research on the importance of headquarters for a while. The hardest part of his book project, he said, was finding an editor who understood he was explaining a regional economic phenomenon, not talking about one Midwestern metro area.
The Twin Cities became his focus because, almost from the moment he arrived at Carlson nearly 20 years ago, he puzzled over why there were so many big companies here. He saw no obvious explanation for it.
Shaver eventually decided this region somehow had more than its fair share of people who knew how to help big companies succeed. To him the word "headquarters" didn't mean an office tower but the people doing home-office work, like managing teams of salespeople, keeping computer networks secure and overseeing financial reporting.
It's his idea that in the Twin Cities these big headquarters had formed into a kind of business cluster.
This is a new way to think of a cluster, as the term usually describes what happens when a bunch of companies more or less in the same industry locate all in one spot and then thrive. Think Silicon Valley for technology or Hollywood for filmed entertainment.