WASHINGTON – Minnesota Supreme Court Justice David Stras won Senate confirmation to the Eighth Circuit Court bench on Tuesday, becoming the first appellate nominee in decades to earn a seat over the objection of a home-state senator.
Stras' nomination was delayed for months by former Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., who argued that Stras was qualified for the job but too conservative for a lifetime appointment to a federal appeals court. After Franken himself was sidelined by controversy that led to his resignation, Senate Republicans did away with the long-standing tradition of "blue-slipping" that allowed home-state senators to unilaterally derail circuit court nominees.
Minnesota's two Democratic senators split on the Stras vote. Sen. Amy Klobuchar joined a bipartisan majority voting to seat Stras. Sen. Tina Smith, newly appointed to fill Franken's seat this month, voted against it. Stras was confirmed by a vote of 56-42. In a statement after the vote, Klobuchar echoed recent remarks in favor of Senate consideration for Stras by highlighting the judge's history of respecting precedent "in the vast majority of cases" in his seven years on the Minnesota Supreme Court.
"While I do not agree with all of his decisions, after carefully reviewing his record I determined that he is qualified to serve on the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals," Klobuchar said.
Smith said she voted no because of concerns over what she described as Stras' embrace of a conservative judicial philosophy called "textualism," in which jurists adopt a rigid interpretation of the Constitution's original meaning.
Smith cited an exchange during Stras' confirmation hearing last year in which Stras said he would begrudgingly apply a hypothetical overturning of the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark Brown v. Board of Education civil rights decision. Smith said Stras reiterated his stance when she asked him about it.
"I may not agree with the way in which Justice Stras approaches every decision that comes before him, but I think it's important to understand how he grapples with questions of basic justice — questions where the case demands more than simply a rote application of precedent, but instead requires that judges fully appreciate the moral gravity of the questions presented," Smith said. "Justice Stras' judicial philosophy does not leave room for that kind of decisionmaking, and I decided to vote against him."
Minnesota Republicans were eager to weigh in on Tuesday.