There is a sneaky union election going on in Minnesota right now that has even fans of public employee unions shaking their heads. If the union wins, a small group of business owners will be able to collectively bargain as "state employees" against their regulator over a state subsidy their customers use to buy their services, and over licensing regulations.
Did you follow that? It gets worse.
The state is not really the employer of these small business owners and they are not really state employees. The majority never asked to be in a union. In fact, they have formed grass-roots associations to fight the union effort. But if the union wins, it can collect taxpayer funds, which is actually the whole point.
Allow me to explain.
In 2013, the DFL legislative majority passed, and Gov. Mark Dayton signed, a bill allowing unionization of certain home-based child care providers. The rationale for declaring these providers "state employees" is a state subsidy called the Child Care Assistance Program (CCAP) that aims to help low-income parents, often single moms, become self-reliant.
At the end of 2015, AFSCME (American Federation of Federal, State, County and Municipal Employees) finished its extensive fieldwork identifying "Yes" votes and filed with the Bureau of Mediation Services (BMS) to organize child care providers who serve CCAP kids. A simple majority of "Yes" ballots will win the election for AFSCME.
Many providers have raised questions about the process and called on Dayton to halt the election. But the solution is not a do-over or a better process. The solution is an outright repeal of the 2013 law.
The 2016 legislative session, which begins March 8, is an opportunity for legislators to reverse this terrible idea before it does more damage.