Bold moves come easy to the St. Paul Federation of Educators, and now, two years after taking the district to the brink of a strike, the union says it is again ready to walk.
Whether a strike actually happens Tuesday depends on mediation sessions that run through Monday. Daily updates have not been encouraging.
Mayor Melvin Carter, a district parent himself, is ready to step in, if needed. But the union and district are at odds over wages plus student mental health supports that the SPFE deems essential and Superintendent Joe Gothard says are too costly.
For the federation, it is all part of a multifaceted "bargaining for the common good" strategy that has influenced teacher strikes elsewhere in the United States — most notably in cities where concerns over poverty and racial inequities make their way into union agendas.
"Obviously, this is part of a trajectory — big-city unions organizing with these kinds of demands," said Jon Shelton, associate professor of democracy and justice studies at the University of Wisconsin-Green Bay. "The crucial thing is they have been able to win. They've mobilized the community."
Gothard argues that a strike is bad for St. Paul — and unnecessary, too.
St. Paul has 2,000 fewer students than it had in 2015-16, he has pointed out, and state and federal aid has fallen short, he added. This year, with teacher contract talks in mediation, the school board learned the district was taking a $4.4 million revenue hit in 2019-20 after a projected loss of 625 students this year rose to 948.
Board members, who are mindful of budget pressures, find themselves adversaries with a federation whose endorsement they covet.