The pundits are right. Minnesota is increasingly going to rely on ALANA (African, Latino, Asian and Native American) communities to meet its labor needs and to support a growing elderly and young dependent population. For the period of 2007 to 2013, using three-year data from the American Community Survey, I found that 2,500 new white workers were added to the state's labor force in aggregate; however, the ALANA communities added more than 70,000 new workers.
Then comes the troubling insight from the data. I looked at the following communities for which comparable data was available — white, black, Latino, Native American and Asian — and three subgroups: Hmong, Mexican and African immigrants.
The black, Latino, Native American, Hmong and Mexican communities experienced an economic squeeze reflected in declining income and homeownership, employment and home equity, combined with low educational levels. The American Indian community had the sharpest decline among all groups during this time period.
At the same time, these ALANA communities continued to fuel the economic engine in Minnesota. Their spending power in the Minnesota economy in 2013 (calculated at 75% of total income) was more than $11 billion, and they paid an estimated $1.7 billion in Minnesota taxes.
People tend to think of these communities as not integral to the economy — as "deficits." However, economic simulations I've done show that if the ALANA workers were to suddenly vanish from the Minnesota economy, we would be candidates for federal disaster aid. For example, recent research funded by the McKnight Foundation showed that African immigrants alone spent more than $500 million in big-box retail and other stores in 2014.
So the data suggest that the groups Minnesota is counting on most to survive the impending demographic squeeze are themselves in an economic squeeze. What can be done about this trend?
There are bright spots in the data. For the period of 2007 to 2012, we have another data set on business formation and growth — the Survey of Business Owners. Analysis of that data show that ALANA firms are growing faster in numbers, sales, job creation and payroll than are non-ALANA firms. This is also true between female-owned and ALANA female-owned firms and veteran-owned and ALANA veteran-owned firms. In fact, if we took all the jobs that ALANA firms created in 2012 — more than 60,000 — this number was larger than the number employed by Minnesota's largest employer, the Mayo Clinic (around 40,000, according to data from the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development).
Black-owned businesses had a 103 percent growth in jobs during the same time that community was experiencing an economic squeeze. The same was the case for American Indian firms and other ALANA firms. So the bottom line is that while these communities experienced an economic squeeze, they were still powering the Minnesotan economy with their spending and tax payment, while at the same time their entrepreneurs were creating jobs for Minnesotans.