
Penn State is coming to town for a men's hockey series this weekend, which means it is time to relitigate (again) how the Nittany Lions ruined college hockey.
If Penn State hadn't added men's hockey – the announcement came way back in 2010, with Division I play beginning in 2012-13 – there wouldn't be Big Ten hockey right now. That was the sixth team needed to form a conference, which happened in 2013-14, as every Gophers fan in the world knows.
That broke up the old WCHA, severed or weakened old rivalries, and put the Gophers into a death spiral from which they still haven't recovered – as every Gophers fan in the world would contend.
Attendance has plummeted, and nothing will ever be the same again.
Yes. But …
I'm tired of this narrative, even if I believe there are a lot of truths contained with in it. There has to be some sort of statute of limitations on these constant ruminations – a way to lament what was lost and why it was lost, sure, but also to maybe move on and try to embrace the future?
I'm trying to get there, trying harder than I probably have in the last five years when I've let bitterness and great memories from old WCHA rivalries – half of it as a kid growing up in Grand Forks, the other half living in Minneapolis – keep me from paying much attention at all to college hockey.
It's easier to make Big Ten hockey a punchline when it produces just one NCAA tournament team (as it did in 2014-15, with the Gophers the sole representative making a quick exit). It's easy to see an announced crowd of 2,000 for a Big Ten tournament game at Mariucci, er, 3M Arena at Mariucci (as happened just last season) and announce that college hockey here is on life support – killed by greed and watered down competition.