In the latest effort to protect wild rice from industrial pollution, the Legislature is being asked to create a special "stewardship council" that could resolve a stubborn impasse involving industry, tribal treaty rights and Minnesota's beloved state grain.
At the same time, a team of scientists working for Minnesota's American Indian tribes has issued a separate set of recommendations — an urgent call for tougher enforcement of existing environmental rules that protect wild rice waters.
The clashing reports spotlight the complexity of protecting Minnesota's dwindling natural wild rice stands and regulating an industrial pollutant called sulfate.
They also expose a rift between Minnesota's DFL establishment and the state's Indian leaders, whose scientists say the state is failing to control sulfate pollution in wild rice waters.
"You're losing a species that can't adapt," said Nancy Schuldt, water projects coordinator for the Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa.

Former Gov. Mark Dayton appointed a wild rice task force last year after the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency acknowledged it was at a stalemate trying to address the challenge. His group included environmental advocates, state regulators, scientists, representatives from regulated industries such as taconite companies, and a few tribal representatives.
It released its final report last month.
The core recommendation: The Legislature should create and fund a Wild Rice Stewardship Council that would include scientists, representatives of state government, private stakeholders and all of Minnesota's 11 federally recognized Indian tribes. While the report doesn't spell out the stakeholders, it is generally assumed they would include representatives from regulated industries such as taconite mining and big utilities, who also sat on the task force.