A few years ago, I sent an e-mail to a University of Minnesota regent to express my concern about what appeared to be a pattern of lavish spending by the university.
My comments were triggered by the golden parachutes provided to former President Robert Bruininks and former Athletic Director Joel Maturi, the six-figure salaries being paid to legions of administrators and the seemingly unlimited budget for pricey consultants and outside law firms.
I told the regent I had had the good fortune to attend the university at a time when students could work their way through school, a quaint notion in today's world. And I urged him to do whatever possible to control university spending — to help keep tuition in check and reduce the need for today's students to pile up mountains of debt.
This regent responded with a brief note that he and his colleagues wanted to give administrators maximum latitude to do their jobs, lest the board stifle "innovation." He had not one word to say about skyrocketing tuition or soaring student debt.
As a university alumnus, former adjunct instructor and a frequent (albeit modest) contributor, I have great affection for the U. It prepared me for a rewarding career and connected me with several professors who became lifelong mentors and friends. But it is an institution that seems increasingly arrogant, out of control and insensitive to the needs of students.
The latest evidence comes in published reports of the lavish, almost laughable expenses of administrators and coaches in the athletic department that were reimbursed by the university. How could any public institution justify spending:
• Nearly $30,000 in a three-year period for Athletic Director Norwood Teague to wine and dine donors, staff and others. And I mean "wine" — to the tune of almost $11,000.
• $24,444 in lodging and registration fees for women's basketball coach Marlene Stollings and her staff to attend a coaches' convention in Tampa, Fla.