A proposal by Gov. Tim Walz to make Minnesota's electricity providers generate all their energy from clean sources, like solar and wind, by 2050 drew immediate criticism Monday for being too costly and unreliable.
"The new policies will ensure reliable, affordable and sustainable electricity in Minnesota," said Walz, a Democrat. "They'll also give the state a cleaner, healthier environment and a strong clean-energy economy."
Environmental organizations and student advocates cheered the move. Republicans and some utility companies said it would raise energy prices for consumers and put too much pressure on an energy system that so far hasn't proved to be reliable.
"Renewable resources are not available all the time. You know the sun doesn't shine and the wind doesn't blow 24/7," said Joni Livingston of Missouri River Energy Services, which provides electricity in 25 communities around Minnesota.
Walz's idea differs slightly from a similar requirement state lawmakers recently proposed. The legislators' measure set a series of benchmarks that companies would have to meet in the years leading up to 2050. Walz said he left those out, giving companies more flexibility as they work toward 100 percent. He said he hopes they will "blow by" the benchmarks legislators want to set and achieve the goal even earlier than 2050.
The additional flexibility is helpful as utilities come up with strategies based on the resources available to them, said Livingston. Nonetheless, she said she is worried about the limits of renewable energy.
"Achieving that goal is going to be very challenging and it's going to be very expensive. That's really if it can be accomplished at all," she said.
Xcel Energy, the state's largest energy provider, has already set its own goal of going carbon-free by 2050. The bill legislators previously proposed would push the company to move faster, with a 2045 deadline. Walz's plan doesn't include that more ambitious time frame for Xcel.