Gov. Tim Walz unveiled the first phase of his 2020 state bonding proposal Thursday, recommending to the Legislature that Minnesota borrow $276 million to pay for affordable housing projects across the state.
The DFL governor said the figure, an increase from levels proposed by previous administrations, would go a long way in "addressing a need that all Minnesotans know is real."
A supermajority of the Legislature must ratify the governor's borrowing proposal, meaning that it will require votes from both Democrats and Republicans to pass into law.
"The need is there and the coalition is ready to go," Walz said. "We simply have an opportunity here to make a historic investment, get ahead of this curve and put Minnesota in a position to make sure all Minnesotans have affordable housing."
The funding is part of a sweeping public works package that Walz intends to roll out in four phases over the next week. He also will focus on investments in water systems, higher education buildings, public safety, roads and bridges. Walz said the full package includes more local projects than any bonding bill proposed by his predecessors.
The governor said Thursday that the total borrowing package, known as a bonding bill, would total roughly $2 billion. But he has so far declined to give a specific number. The full picture will not come into focus until next Wednesday, when Walz presents the final piece of his proposal.
With a multiday debut, Walz aims to focus public attention on specific public funding needs rather than the overall amount of borrowing, which is likely to be a point of contention in the legislative session that starts next month. Historically, bonding proposals have drawn a strong reaction from Republican lawmakers.
During an announcement of the state's budget surplus in December, legislators hinted at the size of the borrowing bill they would like to see in 2020. House Democrats noted that Rep. Mary Murphy, chairwoman of the committee that focuses on capital investment projects, had suggested a $3.5 billion package. Top Republicans, meanwhile, say a $2 billion bonding bill would be too large.