Hundreds of millions of dollars more for education, the expansion of a public option for health insurance and a 20-cent gas tax increase are key pieces of Gov. Tim Walz's two-year budget proposal presented Tuesday.
The Democratic governor's plan would spend $49.5 billion over two years, an 8.6 percent boost from the current budget cycle, with significant new spending on statewide transportation projects.
"Racial, geographic and economic disparities in education and health care hold back our state from reaching its full potential," Walz said Tuesday. "Minnesotans across the state struggle to find child care and housing that is affordable. Crumbling roads and bridges hamper our economy and threaten our safety."
Walz's proposal faces a tough political test in the months ahead, as he enters negotiations with Republicans at the Capitol who oppose tax increases and aim to hold down growth in state spending.
"This uncontrolled spending will give Minnesota the reputation of being 'cold California,' " said Senate Majority Leader Paul Gazelka, R-Nisswa. "And if we're not careful, we will move to the position of No. 1 taxed state in the union, which is not something that I will allow."
To help pay for the new spending, Walz's budget includes a 20-cent-per-gallon gas-tax increase phased in over two years and would boost the motor vehicle sales tax and registration tax. Those taxes are estimated to generate $11 billion over 10 years to pay for transit and road and bridge improvements. His proposal also continues a tax on health care providers and pulls more money from corporations through changes to the state tax code.
Along with political challenges, Walz's budget will be tested by economic uncertainty.
The next budget will likely also be defined by the upcoming economic forecast, which state economists and budget officials present next week. The state's tax collection revenue has been down in recent months, indicating the previous estimate of a $1.5 billion budget surplus is likely to dwindle. State leaders already expected the extra cash wasn't going to stretch too far, with predicted inflationary costs of almost $1.2 billion negating the bulk of the surplus.