The people of Hendricks, Minn., thought they had won the feedlot war two years ago when they sued to stop a mega-dairy slated for a hilltop just across the border in South Dakota.
They feared that if the farm's huge manure lagoons ever sprang a leak, the waste would enter a nearby stream and run straight down into Lake Hendricks, a civic gem they just rescued from years of pollution.
But now, for a second time, county officials in South Dakota granted a permit for the 4,000-cow feedlot. And opponents find themselves up against not just the leaders of Brookings County and a big dairy business operator, but also the state's governor — an enterprising Republican who is courting dairy farmers from California and elsewhere with the promise of plentiful water, low taxes and light regulation.
Shocked by their loss, members of the Lake Hendricks Improvement Association are contemplating their next step. On Dec. 13, they met and discussed how to fight on, then tabled the decision for another two weeks, buying time to find a second round of funding. The first lawsuit cost $90,000, members said, and they are tapped out.
"We're essentially back to square one," said former mayor Jay Nelson.
The fight highlights the fundamental challenges of how environmental resources are managed when shared across state borders. Brookings County has become South Dakota's largest milk-producing county with eight big dairy feedlots. Officials there say they can protect local water without shutting down an important economic engine.
Opponents in Hendricks, home to about 1,100 people if you count the lake homes, cite calculations by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that a farm with 4,000 dairy cows would produce the same volume of waste as a city of 650,000 people.
"If there's a major spill, it's a South Dakota problem for one hour and it's a Minnesota problem for a long period of time," said Tom Landmark, the lake association secretary.