Which players will take to the ice for the Wild next season is all but finalized, the normal status for an NHL roster on the brink of August that has had nearly four months to recalibrate through the draft and free agency.
But who will oversee this roster is suddenly unclear.
Only 14 months after hiring him, the Wild dismissed Paul Fenton from his post as general manager Tuesday — an unsurprising move in the sense it capped off a tenure that was tumultuous but a decision that puts the organization in a bizarre spot seeking leadership about six weeks ahead of training camp.
"The reason for the termination is not any one big issue," owner Craig Leipold said during a news conference at the team's St. Paul headquarters. "Over a time, smaller issues just were building up and [I] ultimately decided that this was not a good fit. Our organization and our culture were a little different than the way Paul wanted to handle things. We just felt this was the time to do it, and we were going to move forward in a different direction."
Guiding the Wild past the first round of the playoffs and toward a Stanley Cup was Fenton's objective when he was named the third GM in franchise history on May 21, 2018, after 12 seasons as an assistant GM in Nashville. He filled Chuck Fletcher's void after Fletcher's contract wasn't renewed.
Instead, the Wild missed the postseason for the first time in seven years and looked caught in the unenviable position of having too veteran a roster to embrace a rebuild but not competitive enough to seriously contend — a tricky no man's land that Leipold seemed to acknowledge when he said, "We're kind of in an area of not really knowing where we're going to go."
Leipold delivered the news to Fenton, 59, Tuesday morning over the phone, a conversation Leipold described as brief and one he sensed caught Fenton off guard. The two had worked with each other in the past, when Leipold owned the Predators from 1998-2007.
While Leipold came to know Fenton as a strong scout and talent evaluator, Leipold said other facets of the GM role — such as his managerial style and how he motivated departments — didn't meet expectations.