Sometime this month, Wild owner Craig Leipold will announce the hiring of a new general manager, his third hockey boss since 2018. Together, they will lay out their vision and blueprint for the future. Reality isn't so clear.
In wake of Paul Fenton's regrettable "tenure," the Wild find itself in a strange place — dysfunction. The organization has been steady since its inception, not always with success on the ice but in terms of stability and a general perception that its leaders were organized and well-intentioned and had a plan.
The operation now seems in disarray. And it's hard to know or make sense of what their plan exactly is.
Fenton tried to go young in reshaping the roster in a semi-rebuild while simultaneously pursuing aging players — a dizzying display of mixed messages. Leipold desperately wants to return to the playoffs and has zero patience for an outright rebuild. But the Wild roster, as constructed, isn't a championship contender.
ESPN's hockey staff recently ranked the Wild 25th in its NHL power rankings, and betting oddsmakers aren't much more optimistic. Those are only predictions, but they provide insight into outside, unbiased perceptions of the team.
Season-ticket renewals are declining. Fan frustration is rising. The new GM will inherit contracts with no-trade clauses.
This feels like a pivotal moment in the organization's existence, similar to that July 4 seven years ago when Leipold pushed all his chips to the middle of the table by signing Zach Parise and Ryan Suter.
Here was Leipold's answer when asked on the day he fired Fenton where the organization currently stands: