De Andre Hudson got the bad news on a recent weekday evening when he called the homeless hot line at Simpson United Methodist Church, asking if the city had an open shelter bed.
No luck. Every adult shelter bed in Minneapolis was filled, an advocate who was taking phone calls, told him. It meant another night spent riding the light rail back and forth between Minneapolis and St. Paul. Forty others like Hudson would also be denied.
"It's been like this for three months," said Hudson, 45, a bag of clothes beside him. "I don't like living on the street."
A $400,000 federal grant offered to the city could provide temporary shelter for Hudson and dozens like him, and it's at the heart of a debate among officials and advocates on how the city of Minneapolis spends money it receives from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
HUD does not dictate how the grant should be spent, but a long-standing City Council policy dictates that money from the Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) can be used only for capital expenses, such as upgrading buildings or equipment and street outreach. Advocates want the money used for daily operating expenses that would allow for more staffing and beds, which is prohibited by the City Council policy.
Monica Nilsson, a shelter advocate and former homeless outreach manager for St. Stephen's Human Services, says the city should allow more flexibility in how the money is spent.
"What's more important than having a safe place to sleep?" she asks.
Minneapolis gets an annual allocation from HUD for shelter programs, said David Frank, interim director of the city's Community Planning and Economic Development (CPED) department. He said there are three priorities: facilities upgrades, street outreach and rapid rehousing.