(The Minnesota Star Tribune)
How Biden's Zero-Carbon Revolution Would Broaden the Energy Map. CNN Politics has the analysis; here's an excerpt: "...Included in Biden's massive $2 trillion infrastructure package is a provision that would require every state to generate all of its electricity by 2035 from fuels that do not produce any of the carbon emissions linked to global climate change. Such a transition would trigger a massive spending boom in wind and solar power — at least doubling the pace of investment now underway — and that could disperse opportunity for energy-related jobs across many more states than benefit today, energy experts say. The reason: While relatively few states now dominate the production of the oil, coal and natural gas that currently provide most of the nation's power, far more states are positioned to generate significant amounts of solar, on- or off-shore wind and other sources of carbon-free power, according to a recent study by the Decarb America Research Initiative that modeled the nation's energy usage through 2050 under a plan like Biden's..."
(Zack Labe, Twitter/The Minnesota Star Tribune)
Spiking Atmospheric Methane Levels 'Very Scary Indeed': Climate Nexus has headlines and links: "Atmospheric methane levels surged in 2020, a new report from NOAA shows, accelerating an increasing trend, alarming scientists, and possibly auguring a vicious cycle of global heating. NOAA also announced global atmospheric carbon dioxide levels are higher than at any point in the last 3.6 million years. "It is very scary indeed," Euan Nisbet, professor of earth sciences at Royal Holloway University of London, told the Financial Times. About 60% of methane emissions are caused by human activity, and U.S. oil and gas operations are a major driver of recent methane pollution increases. "Although increased fossil emissions may not be fully responsible for the recent growth in methane levels," NOAA research chemist Ed Dlugokencky said in a statement, "reducing fossil methane emissions are an important step toward mitigating climate change." Methane is a far more potent heat-trapping gas than carbon dioxide, and scientists are worried global warming could be triggering accelerated methane releases from tropical wetlands and melting arctic permafrost. "Our path to net zero is obvious, challenging and necessary," Martin Siegert, a professor at the Imperial College London, told the Guardian, "and we must get on with the transition urgently." (FT $, USA Today, The Guardian, The Hill, CBS; Climate Nexus backgrounder)
(Jeffrey Kerby/The Minnesota Star Tribune)
More Lightning in the Arctic is Bad News for the Planet. WIRED.com (paywall) explains why: "...The Arctic has gone so bizarro that lightning—a warm-weather phenomenon most common in the tropics—is now striking near the North Pole. And according to new modeling, the electrical bombardment of the region will only get worse. By the end of the century, the number of lightning strikes across the Arctic could more than double, which may initiate a shocking cascade of knock-on effects—namely, more wildfires and more warming. "The Arctic is a rapidly changing place, and this is an aspect of the transformation that I'm not sure has gotten a whole lot of attention, but it's actually really consequential," says UCLA climate scientist Daniel Swain, who wasn't involved in the research..."
US Drought Monitor (https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu//The Minnesota Star Tribune)
(The Minnesota Star Tribune)
Study: Drought-Breaking Rains More Rare, Erratic in US West. Associated Press has the story; here's an excerpt: "Rainstorms grew more erratic and droughts much longer across most of the U.S. West over the past half-century as climate change warmed the planet, according to a sweeping government study released Tuesday that concludes the situation is worsening. The most dramatic changes were recorded in the desert Southwest, where the average dry period between rainstorms grew from about 30 days in the 1970s to 45 days between storms now, said Joel Biederman, a research hydrologist with the U.S. Department of Agriculture Southwest Watershed Research Center in Tucson, Arizona. The consequences of the intense dry periods that pummeled areas of the West in recent years were severe — more intense and dangerous wildfires, parched croplands and not enough vegetation to support livestock and wildlife..."
Google Earth image of a healthy forest on the right and a ghost forest with many dead trees on the left. (Emily Ury/The Minnesota Star Tribune)
Sea-Level Rise is Killing Trees Along the Atlantic Coast, Creating "Ghost Forests" Visible from Space. Sea level rise and increased salinity are taking a toll on coastal wetlands and forests. The Conversation has the post; here's an excerpt: "...As global sea levels continue to rise, coastal woodlands from the Gulf of Mexico to the Chesapeake Bay and elsewhere around the world could also suffer major losses from saltwater intrusion. Many people in the conservation community are rethinking land management approaches and exploring more adaptive strategies, such as facilitating forests' inevitable transition into salt marshes or other coastal landscapes. For example, in North Carolina the Nature Conservancy is carrying out some adaptive management approaches, such as creating "living shorelines" made from plants, sand and rock to provide natural buffering from storm surges..."
(Grist/The Minnesota Star Tribune)
Waves of Abandonment. The Permian Basin is ground zero for a billion-dollar surge of zombie oil wells, Grist reports. Here's an excerpt from their post: "...Texas and New Mexico have already identified about 7,000 abandoned wells that were once operated by over 1,000 companies. State officials estimate these will cost $335 million to plug. The states define wells as "orphaned" if they don't have an approved operator on record; additionally, Texas only includes wells that haven't produced in at least a year. However, a healthy chunk of roughly 100,000 "idled" wells in those states could also eventually end up abandoned. (This article uses the term "abandoned" to encompass wells on the states' orphan lists as well as inactive wells we found to be in disrepair.) Exactly how many wells will end up on the states' rolls is an open question..."