As the former head of the Minneapolis Police Department's Sex Crimes Unit, I would like to respond to the allegation of 1,700 untested rape kits ("Minneapolis police discover 1,700 untested rape kits," Nov. 16).
In 2015, due to national controversy regarding untested rape kits, my unit undertook an audit to determine if a problem existed regarding rape kit testing in Minneapolis.
A patrol officer was assigned to conduct the audit under my direct supervision. The audit covered the years 2000-2015, since that is what the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) requested for its report.
The officer went to both locations where the rape kits are stored by the MPD. She physically handled each rape kit and recorded its status on a spreadsheet she had constructed. The spreadsheet contained the case number of each kit and indicated whether it had been tested or not. If the kit had not been tested, she also recorded the reason for not testing on the spreadsheet.
It should be noted that there are legitimate investigative and ethical reasons for not testing some rape kits.
It is easy to determine whether a kit has been tested by physically looking at it. When test samples are collected and placed in a kit it is sealed for evidentiary reasons. If the seal has been broken, it has been tested. If the seal is intact, it has not been tested. The results of this physical audit were as follows:
There were 1,565 rape kits in MPD custody. Of these, 1,056 rape kits had been tested either by the BCA or Hennepin County Crime Lab. That left 509 untested rape kits to deal with.
Of these untested kits, 315 were from unreported rapes. To clarify, the victim had undergone an exam but for personal reasons decided not to report the alleged crime to the police. It would be a waste of taxpayer-funded resources to test such kits, since nothing can be done with the results. According to federal policy, DNA profiles cannot be entered into the national database unless there is a reported crime.