Monday was a triumph for women’s basketball.
Four great teams played in two separate NCAA region finals, with each school led by a recognizable star: Caitlin Clark for Iowa vs. Angel Reese of LSU; Paige Bueckers of UConn vs. JuJu Watkins of USC.
The games delivered on multiple levels, which is not always the case when contests are so highly anticipated. They were competitive. The stars shined brightly.
If you follow a lot of sports fans and went on social media at all from roughly 6 p.m. through the end of Monday, you probably found that your feed was dominated by reactions to and commentary about women’s basketball — something Patrick Reusse and I talked about on Tuesday’s Daily Delivery podcast.
Women’s basketball has been growing in popularity for decades, but it has surged in the last few years. One could easily make the argument that by this stage of both tournaments, the women’s version qualifies as appointment viewing over the men’s.
While women’s basketball arguably never has been better than it is right now, men’s college basketball arguably has never been worse.
The transfer portal combined with name, image and likeness have impacted both the women’s and men’s games. But it hasn’t had the same profound, compounding effect on the women’s game as the men’s.
Even before the portal and NIL blasted a larger hole, a lot of the top men’s players were already leaving school after a year for the lure of multi-million NBA contracts. Combine that with the transfer ecosystem and it is increasingly rare to find a star who stays even two years at the same men’s program.