A coalition of police reform groups on Wednesday chastised elected officials for allowing the Minneapolis police union to conduct closed-door contract talks through the state Bureau of Mediation Services (BMS), instead of continuing to bargain in the open.
Shifting the negotiations to private mediation was “a pretext for shutting out the public,” said Stacey Gurian-Sherman, of MPLS for a Better Police Contract, a watchdog group that won a lawsuit permitting citizens to observe labor negotiations for the first time in the city’s history.
Gurian-Sherman and about 20 supporters held a news conference on the sidewalk outside the BMS office Wednesday to highlight concerns that contract discussions without public scrutiny will focus solely on raising wages without ensuring necessary reforms.
They criticized Mayor Jacob Frey and the Police Officers Federation of Minneapolis for denying public access.
Under state law, either party — public employers or labor unions — can request that negotiations be moved to mediation, a generally closed process that bars public observers and shields any documents from potential data requests. The police federation on Dec. 1 asked a state mediator to intervene, arguing that the five public meetings to date had been “ineffective” in addressing the key issues.
In a brief interview Wednesday, Johnny Villarreal, the mediation bureau’s commissioner, defended the closed-door policy. “We think it’s best for the process and the parties to reach a mutual agreement with the assistance of a trained professional mediator,” he said.
He has stood firm in that opinion, even after receiving a letter in February from Minneapolis City Council President Elliott Payne and Vice President Aisha Chughtai urging Villarreal to make the negotiations public.
“Closed mediation may indeed lead to a resolution, but it risks producing outcomes that lack the public accountability and reforms fervently sought by both the community and the City Council,” they wrote.