The first Minneapolis election campaign since the death of George Floyd is dominated by questions over the future of public safety in the city. Activists on both sides of the debate are working behind the scenes to influence the message and the policy coming out of City Hall.
A global group whose lobbying arm is funding a campaign to replace the Minneapolis Police Department reached out in recent months to City Council members who pledged to fulfill that same goal. It later thanked them for sharing "fresh strategies to win."
A pro-police group headed by a Richfield resident coordinated with Mayor Jacob Frey's office and produced a video featuring Police Chief Medaria Arradondo arguing against budget cuts.
More than 2,000 pages of e-mails stored on the city's servers and obtained by a records request provide a window into the extent to which outside groups are seeking to influence policing proposals — and their perceptions in the community.
The exchanges highlight the fine line elected officials must walk as they vote on public safety policies that also have become the focal point in a fierce election season.
Groups organizing on both sides say they are giving a voice to the unheard and accuse their opponents of using questionable tactics and conspiring to undermine them. Meanwhile, council members and Frey were warned by the city's top ethics officer to avoid crossing the line between policymaking and campaigning.
With Minneapolis politics under national scrutiny, and many politicians in tough re-election fights, that line is increasingly hazy.
Strategy on ballot questions
Years before Floyd's death, many council members joined Local Progress, a national group formed in 2012 to help progressive politicians share ideas.