The groundbreaking legal reckoning isn't over yet for four former Minneapolis police officers responsible for George Floyd's public killing on a south Minneapolis street almost two years ago.
As Tou Thao, J. Alexander Kueng and Thomas Lane await sentencing on this week's federal court conviction, they also head toward another trial. In June, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison's office is set to prosecute the three in state court on charges of aiding and abetting former officer Derek Chauvin's murder of Floyd.
The fate of the three remains entwined with that of Chauvin, who is serving a state sentence of more than 22 years. The duration of his federal sentence will factor into the sentences of the other three. It's also likely to influence the calculations of the officers and prosecutors on whether to negotiate a plea deal to avoid another costly and emotional trial in Minneapolis.
"Chauvin's sentence will inform the defense team as to what their clients are truly facing," former U.S. Attorney Tom Heffelfinger said.
The situation is unusual because the guilty verdicts, delivered in St. Paul's federal courthouse late Thursday afternoon, may be the first of their kind in the United States, said Christy Lopez, a Georgetown Law professor and former deputy chief for the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division.
"In terms of a federal prosecution of officers, I couldn't find any case where they were prosecuting officers failing to intervene against a superior officer," she said. "I think that's really significant."
Lopez said the verdict was "far from a foregone conclusion," and will send a message to police and prosecutors of a change in how the public — and jurors — view police misconduct.
Ayesha Bell Hardaway, associate professor and co-director of the Social Justice Institute at Case Western Reserve University School of Law in Cleveland, said the verdicts "put a significant dent in the blue wall," the culture of silence that says cops can't "rat out or snitch on fellow officers."