Albert Lea residents scrambled a few years ago to recruit a new health care provider after Mayo Clinic announced it would start closing many hospital services in the southern Minnesota town.
The effort culminated last summer with the opening of MercyOne Albert Lea Family Medicine & Specialty Care, a new facility that's competing for patients against the clinic and hospital operations that Mayo still runs in the community.
But some patients say their access to the new clinic is being sharply limited by insurance rules that make visits to MercyOne much more expensive. It's a problem for seniors enrolled in Medicare health plans from Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, the dominant carrier in the market.
The dust-up is the latest example of how rules governing insurance networks — the subset of clinics and hospitals where subscribers pay less out of pocket to see a doctor — can limit choices for seniors as more elect to receive their government benefits through private Medicare Advantage health plans.
At least some of the affected seniors are asking Blue Cross to work with Mayo to remove the barrier, and recently turned to the state attorney general for help.
"Why would we have a clinic in Albert Lea that we can't use?" asked Jan Mattson, 79, of Albert Lea. "It seems to me like Blue Cross Blue Shield could add Mercy to in-network, and then I would be very happy."
Blue Cross says that it has no plans to add MercyOne to its regional Medicare Advantage network. Mayo has a say in any such change, the insurer says, because contract terms give the Rochester-based clinic "a financial responsibility to improve health outcomes and lower health care costs in southern Minnesota," Blue Cross said in a statement.
Specific contract terms that would illustrate exactly how this all works are confidential. But agreements like the one between Blue Cross and Mayo are described in the insurance industry as "narrow" or "focused" network arrangements.