Ann Lenczewski is leaving the Minnesota House much as she arrived 17 years ago. She's still fixated on tax policy.
The Bloomington DFLer may have been the only first-time legislative candidate in the history of Star Tribune editorial endorsement interviews to confide that she was itching to take a seat on the House Tax Committee and tear into such esoterica as fiscal disparities, municipal overburden and aid-to-levy ratios.
That was in 1998. Last week, days after announcing that she would step down on Dec. 15, in the middle of her ninth term, she flew to Boston to attend the National Tax Association's annual conference to take in sessions like "Macroeconomic Policy and Tax Policy Interactions."
Lenczewski, 55, who resigned to take a lobbying post with the law firm Lockridge Grindal Nauen, pointed last week to another way in which she's come full circle. She arrived at the Legislature when the state was flush with a budget surplus, a bonus generated by the dot.com bubble of the late 1990s. She leaves with a surplus accumulating again. A new budget forecast is scheduled for release on Thursday and is widely expected to project that state tax revenue will surpass expenditures by at least $1 billion through June 30, 2017.
State government sometimes seems like a continuously showing movie. One can arrive at any point, stay long enough and eventually see scenes one has seen before. But Lenczewski fervently hopes Minnesota doesn't witness a rerun of the fiscal show of the last 17 years — particularly its early portion. Legislators in 1999, 2000 and 2001 opted for permanent tax cuts to adjust for what turned out to be a transitory surplus and socked state and local governments with a decade of financial pain beginning in 2002.
Those permanent tax cuts were a mistake, Lenczewski counsels. "We're kind of in the same place again, with a surplus. I would ask that we be really cautious. We should look to one-time solutions on the tax cut side, and try not to undo the things that we did to correct the mess that was made the last time."
Lenczewski was a minority freshman in 1999. She said she felt unable to stop the tax-cut train that started rumbling through the state House and picked up steam from her own party's leaders, who dangled fiscal temptation in front of a new Republican majority with an amendment to enlarge tax cuts for the middle class. The GOP took the bait, gambling that the strong, Internet-fueled economy would last.
That bet was lost. But with control of state government divided between the two parties for the next decade, recurring deficits "just became standard Republican and Democratic talking points. … There was this nonstop argument: 'taxes are bad,' 'taxes are good.' The direction we were heading was not sustainable, but there was never any movement."