Anton Lazzaro, the Minneapolis GOP donor charged with federal child sex trafficking crimes, is again asking a judge to dismiss his indictment over claims that he is being singled out for prosecution based on his wealth and political activity.
Lazzaro, indicted on 10 counts of child sex trafficking charges, has gone through multiple legal teams while filing a volley of motions to drop his charges since his arrest more than a year ago. Federal prosecutors last week filed their own rebuttal against his latest effort to get the case thrown out.
"In filing this motion, Defendant Lazzaro continues his well-documented pattern of lodging unsupported allegations and personal attacks," wrote Assistant U.S. Attorney Emily Polachek. "His motion has no basis in fact or in law."
Lazzaro first asked a judge to dismiss charges on similar grounds in January, alleging that he was being prosecuted based on his wealth and prominent status as a major Republican donor. He fired most of those original attorneys weeks later before the second iteration of his legal team withdrew that argument over his objections.
Days later, Lazzaro fired those lawyers and his new representation, led recently in legal arguments by attorney Daniel Gerdts, revived those claims last month in addition to arguments that investigators improperly listened to jailhouse call recordings between Lazzaro and his attorneys.
Lazzaro argued that he was selectively prosecuted because he was the only person facing federal prosecution from among the "hundreds of tips" to the National Human Trafficking Hotline and that others were prosecuted for prostituting minors at the state level. Polachek countered that he has a co-defendant, Gisela Castro Medina, who is also still in custody and awaiting trial.
Medina was a college student with minimal political activity and very few assets when she was arrested, Polachek said, yet she faces many of the same charges — "thereby demonstrating that the defendant was not selectively prosecuted."
Lazzaro is also arguing that he is the "object of a vindictive prosecution" because of the government's disapproval of his relationship with a far younger woman.