Ramsey County leaders have rejected all proposals from developers vying to build on the shuttered Ponds golf course in Maplewood.
The County Board reviewed the three proposals — for a private golf course, a single-family home development and a senior and multifamily home development — in a Jan. 18 closed session. The proposals from Bradley R. Behnke Golf Management, D.R. Horton Inc. and United Properties didn't align with board members' priorities, they said. County leaders say they will confer with city leaders and community members and "regroup."
"We thank the developers for their thoughtful proposals," Board Chair Trista MatasCastillo said in a statement. "While none of these proposals were ultimately selected to continue forward, we remain optimistic about the potential of both sites and look forward to further discussions with Maplewood about future use."
Last year, the county issued two requests for developer interest for the 88-acre golf course, referred to as the south property, and a nearby 77-acre undeveloped parcel adjacent to the county corrections facility and Battle Creek Regional Park, referred to as the north property. No proposals were submitted for the north property.
The county's intention to develop the two properties — potentially with affordable housing — has sparked intense community debate. Environmental groups including the Friends of the Mississippi River, St. Paul Audubon Society and Friends of Maplewood Nature Center are lobbying to save the north site, which is a nesting ground for grassland birds, including the Henslow's sparrow, which is on the state's endangered species list.
The county declined to release the three developer proposals to the Star Tribune, saying under state statute, they will remain private "until the County abandons plans for the sale of the property or issues a new solicitation."
According to a statement from the county, the proposals were vetted against priority areas including land use feasibility, financial feasibility and alignment with equity goals.
"At this time the Board determined there wasn't a proposal that aligned across all critical areas," the statement said. "There isn't a single vision for the site and the team is regrouping now to continue work with the City of Maplewood and the community to continue evaluation of both north and south parcels for future development."