Minnesota State University Mankato destroyed notes from its controversial investigation of head football coach Todd Hoffner, who was fired by the school but ultimately won back his job.
The finding, part of a 19-page state legislative auditor's report released Thursday, as well as the "starkly different ways" the school and Hoffner see the case, likely means that key questions surrounding the school's probe of Hoffner may never be satisfactorily answered.
The report did not take sides in the nationally watched dispute, which started in August 2012 when Hoffner was removed from his job after school officials found nude pictures of his children on his school cellphone.
"We did not try to decide who was 'right,' " noted the report, done at the request of state lawmakers and university leaders. "What we can report, however, is that both sides still think they were right."
The report said the legislative auditor's investigation came because of confusion over how Richard Davenport, the school's president, could fire Hoffner and a state arbitrator could later reinstate him. The two decisions "have raised questions and concerns about how two public officials could reach such different decisions based on the same evidence," the report added.
The report said Davenport told state officials he responded to the Hoffner situation in light of the Penn State University football sex scandal that was unfolding at the time and garnering nationwide attention. Penn State assistant coach Jerry Sandusky had just been found guilty of child sex abuse and school administrators there were indicted on a charge of endangering the welfare of children and other charges.
Davenport and other school officials, according to the report, "believe they acted in a reasonable, well-intentioned and justified way" but were prohibited from making public many aspects of the case due to state privacy laws.
Hoffner's attorney Christopher Madel took issue with comparison to the Sandusky case, saying in a response letter that Hoffner's case had nothing to do with sexual abuse or similar misconduct. Equating Hoffner with Sandusky is "absurd" Madel wrote, adding "that [if] a person could draw such a comparison [it] exemplifies why that person should not have the authority to make life-changing employment decisions affecting others."