For months, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and Senate Democrats have talked about eliminating the filibuster. With Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death, some Senators have said they must get rid of the filibuster so that they can pack the Supreme Court.
Even if not used to pack the Supreme Court, eliminating the filibuster would radically transform the Senate and our country.
During the first presidential debate, Biden refused to answer the question about the filibuster. Last week, during the Minnesota Senate debate with Republican challenger Jason Lewis, Sen. Tina Smith was asked the same question. She said: "I'm not gonna go there."
With surveys showing Americans oppose packing the Supreme Court, it is obvious why Democrats have gotten shy about telling voters their plans.
Those who dislike President Donald Trump may think it's OK to let the Democrats run things for four years. "Never Trumpers" might be fearful of the leftward lurch of the Democratic Party, but believe they could always fix things four years later. But the threat of eliminating the filibuster makes this election very different.
Filibusters allow a united minority of senators to prevent legislation from being passed. The Senate can only end a filibuster with 60 or more votes.
No party has 60 seats in the Senate, so legislation requires some bipartisan support. Democrat Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer used to approvingly call the Senate "the cooling saucer for our politics — that can show the nation bipartisanship, compromise and progress."
But if Democrats end the filibuster, simple, party-line majorities will be able to pass bills. And if the same party controls both the House and Senate, legislation will be able to zip right through Congress.