Opinion editor's note: Editorials represent the opinions of the Star Tribune Editorial Board, which operates independently from the newsroom.
•••
President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump are both being investigated over their handling of classified materials. While publicly disclosed information reflects that the cases are clearly different, the investigatory processes should not be.
To that end, Attorney General Merrick Garland rightly appointed special prosecutors in each instance, including naming Robert Hur — a Trump appointee — in the Biden case, just weeks after naming Jack Smith to lead the Trump investigation.

Each special prosecutor should uphold the ethos that justice is blind and follow the facts and the law in each case, without fear or favor and without bowing to the toxic political environment enveloping America.
In that other court — the one of public opinion — citizens should also follow the facts as reported and realize there are key distinctions between the two cases.
First, while the law is clear on the protocol on handling — or in Biden's and Trump's case, mishandling — classified material, the scale and scope of the documents discovered so far differ. More than 300 documents have surfaced in the Trump case, compared with about 10 in the initial discovery regarding Biden. However, further discoveries of classified documents held by Biden attests to the need for a thorough search process.
Biden's attorneys were forthcoming about their initial discovery, which was reported to the National Archives on the same day. Trump's tranche of documents, conversely, were the subject of repeated requests and an eventual subpoena, eventually resulting in the FBI being compelled to search his Mar-a-Lago residence.