A reader sent me an email, with a complaint and a suggestion.
"Your constant preference for reviewing fiction in Sunday's Star-Tribune baffles me. There are many readers who enjoy the many biographies, histories, contemporary affairs, et. al. that are printed on a regular basis, but you seem to continually favor fiction and ignore nonfiction."
That was the complaint. Here's the suggestion: "Since you regularly review five books, why not review three fiction and two non-fiction one week, and three non-fiction and two fiction the next?"
While it's true that sometimes one genre or another dominates the pages on any given Sunday, it's also true that I try to strike a balance over time. The publishing world follows a calendar, and September and early October — when this reader wrote me — are prime seasons for big fiction. November, on the other hand, favors nonfiction.
I went back through this year's reviews and tallied them up: As of mid-October, we have run 137 reviews of fiction, 77 reviews of nonfiction, and three reviews of poetry. (I'm sorry, poetry!)
The reader has a point — fiction dominates. But 77 reviews of nonfiction is hardly ignoring the genre. And it's important to note that a lot of nonfiction appears in other parts of the newspaper, outside of the books pages.
Business books are in the business section. The Taste section reviews cookbooks. The Outdoors section covers books about the outdoors, and our weekly birding columnists in Variety do a good job of writing about bird books.
We don't review political books on the books pages — they get plenty of coverage in the news pages — and we also stay away from self-help, beauty and religion. This leaves essays, history, biography, memoir and science for the books pages — all of which we review. Heck, in July we reviewed a math book.