Use almost any common metric, and stocks are overpriced. All stocks. Everywhere.
Two popular measures tell us a lot.
The Shiller index, for instance, tells us that stocks are currently priced at historic, hyperbolic levels. Right up there with 1929 or the Great Internet Bubble at the turn of the century.
Another metric, regularly used by the late indexing visionary Jack Bogle, tells us that future stock prices will be the sum of three things: dividend yield, earnings growth and the change in price-to-earnings multiple.
Even if you assume that corporate earnings will continue to grow at their historical average pace, future returns will definitely be reduced by today's low dividend yield. And it's far more likely that the P/E multiple will be lower in the future, not higher. Basically, stocks are swimming against the tide.
The only possible conclusion, many believe, is that it is time to sell. I beg to differ, even though I agree with the basic analysis: Stocks are overvalued.
Being overvalued doesn't keep stocks from rising further. Investment manager Jeremy Grantham was famously correct about the excesses of the internet bubble. But he was correct years before the bubble burst. He missed a lot of opportunity. So what's a worrywart to do?
One option is to take some comfort in the long-term return of stocks relative to other investments by examining the odds of having a positive return over different periods. To do this, I asked the researchers at Morningstar to develop figures for the return on large-company stocks.