Dakota County commissioner candidates fielded a series of pointed questions last week about when it's permissible for government to take private land for the greater good.
They shared their views on eminent domain and the Dakota County Greenway Collaborative, which envisions a linked network of parks, trails and outdoor spaces. They also each explained their top priorities if elected and their thoughts on the commissioners' $72,000 salaries and car allowance packages.
Four of the five contenders for the District 1 seat appeared at a candidate forum sponsored by the Dakota County Regional Chamber of Commerce and Sun ThisWeek newspapers. District 1 includes Hastings, Farmington and the southern rural townships. The two candidates who receive the most votes in the Aug. 14 primary will face off in the general election. District 1 Commissioner Joe Harris is not running for re-election after 32 years in office.
Chamber President Ruthe Batulis moderated the hour-long televised forum at Farmington City Hall. The four candidates, three of whom currently hold township or city offices, gave similar answers to many of the questions but tried to stress their differences and highlight their individual experience in the public and private sector.
Here's a look at where the four contenders stand:
Brian Jaye Budenski
Quoting fiery conservative Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, Budenski said the County Board should never use eminent domain. Budenski, a real estate investor and developer, said he fell victim to eminent domain in the late 1990s when the school district took part of his land to build a new middle school in Farmington.
Budenski, chairman of the Eureka Township Board, emphasized his fiscal restraint. Under his leadership, the Eureka board has reduced its tax levy three of the last six years. He said Eureka will pay off the debt for its new town hall in 2014.