Twelve-year-old Laila Moses was reluctant, at first, about getting a routine immunization shot.
So a medical assistant at her Children's Minnesota Partners in Pediatrics clinic in Brooklyn Park rubbed some cream on her arm to numb the injection spot. When it came time for the needle, Moses coughed to distract herself — another pain-reducing method she learned from a nurse earlier — and didn't even feel the jab. She laughed in relief about it afterward.
An offer of pain-reducing tactics, called a "comfort promise," is now routine for every patient at Children's Minnesota. It's part of an effort to make common procedures less upsetting for patients — especially patients of color who historically were not offered it as often.
It's a small part of a larger goal to combat racial disparities in patient care and outcomes in the Children's Minnesota system, where leaders have taken the unusual step of making their disparities and corrective efforts public.
Researchers published a paper late last year that highlighted a sampling of the system's shortfalls in the journal "Pediatrics," and are attempting novel and methodical ways to change them — a model that some health advocates hope others will follow.
"I think a lot of institutions are afraid of data like that," said Dr. Dowin Boatright, assistant professor of emergency medicine at Yale University. "The fact that they're actually willing to examine themselves and make the data transparent is very courageous."
Tackling categories
In a push for change that began in 2018, Children's Minnesota created a pediatric health equity dashboard using data it was already collecting in more than 500,000 patient encounters each year at its 12 outpatient clinics and two hospitals.
A work group analyzed more than 50 metrics to figure out where to concentrate efforts. Data showed, for instance, a 20% difference in how often Black and white children were offered a comfort promise — one of several racial disparities that existed. But after a change in medical assistant training and some new procedural norms, data a year later showed that disparity had been corrected. With no ongoing large disparity, the system moved it off the dashboard.