Sixth-grade U.S. history teacher Andrew Waller flashed a photo of a slice of pizza covered in pineapple chunks onto the screen. The class of preteens blurted-out opinions of the controversial pizza topping.
Waller quieted the room and launched a conversation about respectful disagreement among the preteen Chaska Middle School East students.
“We’re going to talk about issues like immigration, the role of government and what presidents should or should not do,” he said. “I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but adults argue about this stuff all the time ... so we need to come up with some rules.”
In today’s political climate, history and civics teachers are tasked with finding strategies to teach controversial topics without letting their class devolve into partisan debate.
Minnesota has revamped and boosted its civics and social studies requirements in recent years. But even adults can’t always agree on what should be taught or allowed in classrooms, making schools a stage for political and cultural clashes.
That has teachers — and several organizations who support them — brainstorming strategies, rules and lesson plans around civic discourse.
Next month, as part of the Minnesota Civics Summit, teachers can take a professional development workshop all about fostering “challenging, respectful conversations in class about important, sometimes divisive, issues.”
“What we are called to do in this youth civic engagement space is try to create situations where kids get the tools, the knowledge and ultimately the motivations to do it differently than what we see in the public right now,” said Amy Anderson, the leader of the upcoming professional development session and the executive director of the YMCA’s Center for Youth Voice.