Opinion editor’s note: Star Tribune Opinion publishes a mix of national and local commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
When something sounds too good to be true, well, you know the rest of the saying.
In a recent commentary (“How to help Minnesota drivers burdened by the price of auto insurance,” July 23), the “solution” to the issue of uninsured drivers in Minnesota might sound good, but it won’t solve the problem and will further raise auto insurance premiums for everyone else, all while offering substandard insurance that will provide a false sense of security to low-income drivers.
The writer wants more uninsured drivers to be insured, which is something we can all get behind. Under Minnesota law, vehicle owners are required to insure their vehicles at minimum levels. It’s estimated that about 10% of vehicles — about 400,000 — on the road in Minnesota today are not insured.
And that’s a problem for several reasons, including that if you are hit by an uninsured motorist, it’s your insurance that pays. So the 90% of Minnesotans who obey the law and have coverage are already paying for those who don’t.
The premise of the commentary suggests that cost is the only barrier to why someone drives without insurance. The writer argues that, if insurance costed less, everyone would be insured. Even if that were true, it means that either someone would need to further subsidize the cost of these policies, or coverage benefits would need to be slashed so the price comes down. The proposal doesn’t do one; it does both.
To make this program “more affordable,” it would reduce the amount of coverage people are required to carry. Current Minnesota law requires drivers to maintain bodily injury liability of $30,000 per person and $60,000 per accident, as well as $10,000 of property damage liability. The proposed program would reduce those limits to $20,000 per person and $40,000 per accident.