Opinion editor's note: Star Tribune Opinion publishes a mix of national and local commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
By any measure, electronic pulltabs have been a tremendous success story for Minnesota charities, bars, restaurants, taxpayers and fans of the Minnesota Vikings.
In fiscal year 2022, charitable gaming generated $131 million for our state's local charities and $180 million in tax revenue. Since their inception, e-pulltabs have paid off $348 million in bonds on U.S. Bank Stadium, eliminating the state's share of the building 20 years ahead of schedule.
Thanks to the proceeds generated by e-pulltabs, local charities are delivering increased funding for disability services, food shelves, veterans' services, volunteer fire departments, youth sports associations and countless other wonderful charities.
That's why it was so disappointing to read see the April 28 commentary, "More gambling will make more harm a sure thing," misrepresent several issues regarding electronic charitable gaming in Minnesota.
First, the commentary claims that the e-pulltab games played on iPads in bars, restaurants and veterans' clubs since Gov. Mark Dayton signed a bill authorizing their use in 2012 are "virtual slot machines" despite the fact that two administrative law judges have rejected such arguments.
In May 2019, Administrative Law Judge James LaFave rejected the tribal casinos' argument that e-pulltab games approved by the Gambling Control Board violated state law. In May 2020, Administrative Law Judge Barbara Case ruled against the tribal casinos, stating that the e-pulltab games offered by charities don't infringe on the monopoly of the state's tribes to operate video slot machines. Judge Case wrote, "The mere push of a button is too far attenuated to constitute 'mimicking' of a slot machine." In a recent video, Protect Our Charities outlined 12 major differences between slot machines and e-pulltabs.